Article
Canadian Commission on Democratic Expression: How to Make Online Platforms More Transparent and Accountable to Canadian Users
Share
Released:May 4, 2022
Project: DemX
Following six months of study and deliberations, the Canadian Commission on Democratic Expression has settled on a series of principles and recommendations that underlie a practical course of action for the public, governments and social media platforms to protect democratic expression in Canada and to counter the harms created by content posted, shared and amplified through social media platforms. We recognize the complexity of the issues at play in a free and democratic, rights-based society, and offer these recommendations as a path forward. We encourage debate that may further refine them and lead to their implementation in the coming months by governments and regulators.
Principles
- Free speech is fundamental to a democratic society. The internet enables more people to participate in public discussions and debates.
- The rise of hatred, disinformation, politically polarizing content, conspiracies, bullying and other harmful communications online is undermining these gains and having a corrosive impact on democratic expression in Canada, both online and offline.
- The status quo of leaving content moderation to the sole discretion of platforms has failed to stem the spread of these harms. Platform companies can find themselves in conflict between their private interests and the public good.
- The notion that platforms are neutral disseminators of information is faulty. Platforms distribute content to serve their commercial interests and so must assume greater responsibility for the harms they amplify and spread while being mindful that free expression is the bulwark of a democratic society.
- Public agencies must play a more active role in furthering the cause of democratic expression and protecting Canadians from online harms.
- Any policy response must put individuals first, reduce online harms and guard against the possibility that will have chilling effects on participation particularly for Indigenous peoples and other equity seeking groups. This requires a balanced and multi-faceted approach.
- Privacy protections are fundamental to human rights and democratic expression. Remedies to address online harms and protect democratic expression should centre on rights-based approaches, both in safeguarding citizens against possible privacy infringements and empowering individuals with greater control over their data and democratic expression.
- Minors (under 18) are particularly vulnerable to online harms and so platforms which are accessed by minors have a special obligation to ensure that the appropriate safeguards are in place.
- Many like-minded democracies are facing similar challenges to democratic expression in the 21st century and as such Canada should look to act multilaterally and in concert with other like-minded nations as much as it possibly can and where it makes the most sense.
These principles have led the Commission to an interrelated set of recommendations around three core themes of democratic expression: transparency, accountability and empowerment.
Policy Memos:
- Learning Session 1: What data should be shared and with whom?
- Learning Session 2: Should we mandate financial and other disclosures around advertising and, if so, what are the challenges in doing so?
- Learning Session 3: How can we make digital technology more transparent about its impact on, and accountability to, historically marginalized groups?
- Learning Session 4: Should online actors be liable and what legal mechanisms can be used?
- Learning Session 5: How can regulators and publics determine the risks, harms and impacts of algorithmic decision-making systems?
Articles
Recommendations to Strengthen Canada’s Response to the Spread of Disinformation Online
In our second year, we again invited Canadians to volunteer to advise the Commission on Democratic Expression as well as the federal government on the regulation of digital platforms. In the midst of a pandemic, more than 600 Canadians volunteered to serve and 42 were randomly selected to represent the provinces and territories.
Recommendations to Strengthen Canada’s Response to New Digital Technology and Reduce the Harm Caused by their Misuse
How can we create a vibrant digital public sphere that doesn’t by design expose people to an ocean of baser instincts — much less to hatred and abuse? The Citizens’ Assembly on Democratic Expression explores the question of online harms, as Canadians spend more and more time on the Internet, particularly in the COVID-19 pandemic. These 42 members, randomly selected from a pool of volunteers, who we hope represent the widest possible range of voices and perspectives, come together to provide 33 recommendations that balance the harms of misuse of technology with freedom of speech.
Harms Reduction: A Six-Step Program to Protect Democratic Expression Online
The health of our democracy ultimately depends on citizens having the capacity, willingness and opportunity to participate in our public life. Following nine months of study and deliberations, the Canadian Commission on Democratic Expression has settled on a six-part, made-in-Canada plan to address hate speech and other online harms, while balancing freedom of speech.
Processes, People and Public Accountability
Researchers and reporters documented three forms of harmful online communication during Canada’s 2019 federal election campaign: abuse of individuals, intolerance and hate toward marginalized groups in public online spaces, and an increase in support for hate in private online spaces. In this report, authors Heidi Tworek and Chris Tenove propose a framework to distinguish key dimensions of harmful online communication in Canada, and offer several principles to guide policy development in Canada.
The Legal Aspects of Hate Speech in Canada
As a starting point for further dialogue, lawyer Lex Gill explores the legal tensions and policy questions that have historically animated debates surrounding hate speech in Canada. This report summarizes some of the most significant recent developments, in particular the ways technological, economic and social change have begun to challenge the ways we think about harmful expression.
Public Interest and Media Infrastructures
Today’s media systems include the powerful social media companies that watch, commodify, and manipulate us as they buy and sell our data. Mike Ananny urges a more sophisticated understanding of the privately controlled infrastructures where important decisions are made shaping behaviours, beliefs and online news. These might look like boring, messy, technical places where only engineers work, but regulators need to grasp their complexities and tackle the prevailing secrecy to better protect the public interest.
Science Disinformation in a Time of Pandemic
By drawing parallels to elections, climate change and the anti-vaccination movement, author Christopher Dornan illustrates how disinformation about COVID-19 can pose significant risks for public health, social cohesion and collective trust. Dornan identifies several useful recommendations for citizens, governments and social media platforms to consider to effectively combat disinformation and engage in evidence-based discussion about scientific findings.